Register :: Log in :: Profile   


New Article: Nobunaga’s Kanō Free-Market Decrees

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Samurai Archives Citadel Forum Index // Samurai History - Kamakura to Sengoku
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kitsuno
Forum Shogun
Forum Shogun



Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 8973
Location: Honolulu, HI

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 7:25 pm    Post subject: New Article: Nobunaga’s Kanō Free-Market Decrees Reply with quote
Dr. David Neilson has made me aware of a new article about Oda Nobunaga: Nobunaga’s Kanō Free-Market Decrees: A Reconsideration

http://urbanscope.lit.osaka-cu.ac.jp/journal/vol.003.html#vol003-02

This is an article by Hiroshi Niki, translated by Suzanne Gay (author of The Moneylenders of Late Medieval Kyoto) - according to Dr. Neilson, the article tracks the downloads in order to track reader interest - so let's give some points to the Sengoku!
_________________
Shop Amazon.com, support the Samurai Archives: http://amzn.to/wnDX2j

Subcribe to Blog FeedS-A Podcast homepage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ogami Itto
Village Councilman
Village Councilman
Veteran Member



Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 62
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Thanks! looks very interesting!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hosokawa Gracia
Tea Master
Tea Master
Veteran Member



Joined: 30 Nov 2007
Posts: 203
Location: West Coast

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Kitsuno, Thanks for introducing an article on this e-Journal from Osaka City University. http://urbanscope.lit.osaka-cu.ac.jp/index.html

How many other Japanese university e-journals do you know, which have such a high standard of presentation in English and are related to Japanese history or literature?

Carmen
_________________
http://japanesehistoryenthusiast.wordpress.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mr No-Dachi
Rice Farmer
Rice Farmer
Member for 3 years



Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Posts: 43

PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Is it just my not-yet-fluent-in-japanese take or does recent historiography with regards to Nobunaga emphasise how typical he was as a daimyo rather than how different (looking at you Berry). I mean so many of his measures like with regards to trade, subordinates even Buddhist institutions seem to be different only in scale and important only because they are done in the Kinai region and the unification under Hideyoshi and Ieyasu is built on what he does there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tornadoes28
Oki no Kami
Oki no Kami
Member for 4 years
2009 Benefactor
2009 Benefactor



Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 1400
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Mr No-Dachi wrote:
Is it just my not-yet-fluent-in-japanese take or does recent historiography with regards to Nobunaga emphasise how typical he was as a daimyo rather than how different (looking at you Berry). I mean so many of his measures like with regards to trade, subordinates even Buddhist institutions seem to be different only in scale and important only because they are done in the Kinai region and the unification under Hideyoshi and Ieyasu is built on what he does there.


Did you read Japonius Tyrannus: The Japanese Warlord Oda Nobunaga Reconsidered by Jeroen Lamers. I would say that Lamers did not present Nobunaga in the light of a typical Daimyo.
_________________
http://toshogu.blogspot.com

http://twitter.com/Toshogu

Google+
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ltdomer98
Daijo Daijin
Daijo Daijin
Veteran Member



Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 4973
Location: Bayou Country

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Mr No-Dachi wrote:
Is it just my not-yet-fluent-in-japanese take or does recent historiography with regards to Nobunaga emphasise how typical he was as a daimyo rather than how different (looking at you Berry). I mean so many of his measures like with regards to trade, subordinates even Buddhist institutions seem to be different only in scale and important only because they are done in the Kinai region and the unification under Hideyoshi and Ieyasu is built on what he does there.


There are no absolutes in history, and interpretation is usually a matter of perspective. For Berry, her main point is how Hideyoshi changed things, so it's important from her perspective to show the differences between Nobunaga's policies and Hideyoshi's. For Berry, Nobunaga HAS to be part of the older order. It doesn't mean that he was in all ways, or even in most ways--just simply that by comparison, in Berry's opinion, Hideyoshi advanced things significantly from what he did.

Lamers, as Tornadoes pointed out, focuses on Nobunaga, and so presents him in how he was different from the other things before him. If you read things that focus on other Sengoku daimyo, they usually focus on internal domain policies that were different from the Shugo-daimyo before them. For most historians up until recently, they were trying to describe what was going on in any particular time, and the easiest way to do that is to focus on the differences from one period to the next. It's only recently that some historians are focusing more on the continuities and consistencies from period to period, in reaction to the other approach. Both are equally important in understanding the whole picture.

Historians are heavily influenced both by who/what they read that comes before them, and also by the pressure to come up with something "different" from what has come before. Historians of previous decades have focused on Nobunaga as the "first unifier" who started the trend towards unification, making him a "break point" between the past and the future. It's only natural that more recent historians would come back and revisit that idea and provide a different, opposing view, highlighting that he was, in many ways, a continuation of older patterns and that others after him broke those patterns. The reality, or "truth", is that it is a continuum--Nobunaga was neither a radical complete break with the past in all ways, nor was he just another Sengoku daimyo who happened to be successful. He was both, and somewhere in the middle, and how you frame it as a historian will be all about what point you're trying to highlight. For me, for instance, Nobunaga was a brilliant tactician, and I highlight that--but it doesn't mean necessarily that he was a revolutionary tactician, because I can't say definitively that he did anything that anyone else didn't or wouldn't do. There's a lot more that goes into success than tactics at one particular battle, or a handful of economic policies. It's much more complicated, and that's the beauty of it all, to me.
_________________
Bring it on, laddie 'Domer
The Sengoku Field Manual Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Samurai Archives Citadel Forum Index // Samurai History - Kamakura to Sengoku All times are GMT - 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Help the Samurai Archives




alexisRed v1.2 // Theme Created By: Andrew Charron // Samuraized By: Aaron Rister

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group