Register :: Log in :: Profile   


Question about Daimyo's income (石高) in Sengoku Jidai

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Samurai Archives Citadel Forum Index // Samurai History - Kamakura to Sengoku
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wiranobu
Village Councilman
Village Councilman
Member for 1 year



Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 46
Location: Indonesia

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 5:28 pm    Post subject: Question about Daimyo's income (石高) in Sengoku Jidai Reply with quote
Hello everyone, I am an undergraduate Japanology student currently researching about "The Effects of Firearms towards Daimyos Strategy in Sengoku Jidai" as my final paper.

My professor asked me about how can I measure how powerful are the daimyos in the 1500-1600, so I answered area conquered and income. He asked me again how can I measure their income, and I answered through their amount of estates owned and rice production in units of koku 石 (bushels). However, I haven't been able to acquire any data on rice production of daimyos prior to Tokugawa Era. If anyone of you could help provide me with the datas and statistics for reference, I would be delighted!

まことにありがとうございます
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Sakura
Peasant
Peasant
Member for 1 year



Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
On a national level, I'm pretty sure the earliest production estimates you'll find are the findings of Hideyoshi's surveys of each kuni in the 1580s and 90s. But I suspect that those figures will not be particularly useful for estimating the income of the various daimyo operating under different economic systems decades earlier.

Perhaps you could find estimates of the number of men each daimyo had under arms? That might be a better way of measuring power.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wiranobu
Village Councilman
Village Councilman
Member for 1 year



Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 46
Location: Indonesia

PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
The kind of data that I wish to get is the difference between their regional power before and after what I decided to call "The Firearms Era", starting from 1542, when Portuguese sailors carrying arquebuses landed in Tanegashima.

Thanks for pointing out that I could use the number of men they have, I could use it to defend my arguments Smile

So far I have gained several data

1. According to Poplardia Encylopedia, after Onin War, these clans are highlighted as "important", and are categorised from their background (主な大名の出身)

Shugo : Takeda, Imagawa, Rokkaku, Oouchi, Ootomo, Shimazu

Shugodai : Nagao, Asakura, Oda, Amako

Kokujin : Date, Matsudaira (Tokugawa), Azai, Mouri, Chousokabe

Others : Houjou (new Houjou in Odawara) , Saitou

2. John Whitney Hall, The Cambridge History of Japan vol 3 p.132, which highlights:

Houjou, Uesugi, and Takeda in Kantou
Shimazu and Ootomo in Kyuushuu
Chousokabe in Shikoku
Uesugi & Date in Northern Japan
Mouri in Western Japan
Asai&Asakura in Kinai
Oda & Imagawa in Toukai
Tokugawa in Kinki

3. And some maps which showed their controlled areas, which is not of much use, as large area doesn't mean large power; Oda Nobunaga had very little area, but because he's near the Kinki (Kyouto aka capital) he could gain a lot more political and economical power than the Date that controlled significant portion of northern Japan, but is isolated in a barren environment.

However it doesn't get anymore detailed than that. No numbers of koku, no numbers of men amount of power they had. So if anyone had more reference books to recommend I would gladly read it.
_________________
One man's washing machine is another man's music
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
ltdomer98
Daijo Daijin
Daijo Daijin
Veteran Member



Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 4963
Location: Bayou Country

PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 6:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
For anything prior to the Edo period, you're not going to find a list of concrete numbers. Especially prior to Hideyoshi's Taiko Kenchi (nationwide land survey). Things moved too fluidly, and the survey standards varied from domain to domain. Some daimyo taxed in rice (Kokudaka, 石高), others taxed in coins (kandaka 貫高), and the conversions of how many men each retainer was required to provide was determined by each individual daimyo.

As was pointed out, your best bet is to find estimates of total men under arms for each daimyo you are looking at. The Hojo had particularly detailed survey records that survived, along with their registers of how many men each subordinate was to provide. The Koyo Gunkan, the family history of the Takeda clan, provides numbers for each of the Takeda major subordinates, totaling around 30,000.

The Poplardia Encyclopedia you quote appears to be pretty much useless for your question--those designations are simply where each of those daimyo families originated from by class, and not a measure of relative strength.

For info on the economic basis of daimyo strength, I'd look at Hall's Government and Local Power in Japan, 500-1700 for a start.

As for your research topic, you could say I've done a little study on this myself. Here's a list of sources I'd recommend you go look at:

Quote:

Bender, John. E. The Last Man Standing: Causes of Daimyo Survival in Sixteenth Century Japan. Masters Thesis. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, 2008. Web, http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10123/20636, accessed 15 November 2011.

Brown, Delmer M. “The Impact of Firearms on Japanese Warfare, 1543-98.” The Far Eastern Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 3 (May, 1948). Print.

Conlan, Thomas “Instruments of Change: Organizational Technology and the Consolidation of Regional Power in Japan, 1333-1600.” War and State Building in Medieval Japan. Palo Alto, California: Stanford University Press, 2010. Ferejohn, John, and Frances Rosenbluth, editors. Pp. 124-158. Print.

Conlan, Thomas. Weapons & Fighting Techniques of the Samurai Warrior, 1200-1877 AD. London: Amber Books, 2008. Print.

Lamers, Jeroen Pieter. Japonius Tyrannus: The Japanese Warlord, Oda Nobunaga Reconsidered. Japonica Neerlandica. Leiden: Hotei Publishing, 2000. Print.

Lorge, Peter Allan. The Asian Military Revolution: From Gunpowder to the Bomb. New Approaches to Asian History. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Print.

Morillo, Stephen. “Guns and Government: A Comparative Study of Europe and Japan”. Journal of World History, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Spring, 1995), pp. 75-106. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1995. Print ********** YOU NEED TO READ THIS ESSAY. Pretty much exactly what you are looking at.

Varley, Paul. "Oda Nobunaga, Guns, and Early Modern Warfare in Japan." Writing Histories in Japan: Texts and Their Transformations from Ancient Times through the Meiji Era. Ed. James C. Baxter, Joshua A. Fogel. Kyôto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies, 2007. Print.

Varley, Paul. “Warfare in Japan 1467-1600”. War in the Early Modern World, 1450-1815. Florence, Kentucky: Taylor & Francis, 1998. Jeremy Black, ed. Pp. 53-86. Print.


Some of these, like Delmer Brown, give a pretty antiquated view of firearms and their impact on Japanese warfare, but it's important to understand the misconceptions out there.

You can also see the presentation I gave about the Battle of Nagashino at the Japan Studies Association conference in January here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9dr4zNWH6A&feature=youtu.be

I touch on some of the issues you'd have to be looking at.

Also, you can use the podcasts we've done on firearms, and my series on Nagashino, at the Samurai Archives Podcast site.
_________________
Bring it on, laddie 'Domer
The Sengoku Field Manual Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wiranobu
Village Councilman
Village Councilman
Member for 1 year



Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 46
Location: Indonesia

PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 6:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Thank you very much for the amazing response. This helped me a lot. I will look for those sources at the library.

And thank you for the video as well. I'm excited to be able to see other scholars doing similar research, you are definitely putting much effort in this, somehow I feel ashamed for not reading enough material.

I have in my possession an English translation of Arai Hakuseki's Tokushi Yoron, Lessons From History. Is this a good read?
_________________
One man's washing machine is another man's music
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
ltdomer98
Daijo Daijin
Daijo Daijin
Veteran Member



Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 4963
Location: Bayou Country

PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
wiranobu wrote:
Thank you very much for the amazing response. This helped me a lot. I will look for those sources at the library.

And thank you for the video as well. I'm excited to be able to see other scholars doing similar research, you are definitely putting much effort in this, somehow I feel ashamed for not reading enough material.


You're an undergrad, right? The fact that you even thought of this as a topic is impressive. You have no reason to feel bad at all. This is a difficult topic--there's not a lot of academic focus on it, and most of what is out there is flawed. It's only recently that people like Morillo and Lorge (and me!) are challenging the common concepts like the Military Revolution theory that many in the military history field accept as truth. As you'll see in the Morillo article, Japan is the perfect case study for it, as we know exactly when guns became a viable military weaponry (they existed in isolated instances prior to the Portuguese "introducing" them in 1543, but were only able to be reproduced in a mass scale after that--so even though Morillo gets it wrong when he parrots the line that they were "introduced" then, his argument still stands, because it was production, not introduction, that made them a weapon of war rather than a curiosity).

Yeah, I've put a lot of effort into this, but it has required it. Originally it was just going to be one paper and that was that, but there's so much more to the topic. Eventually it became my Master's thesis, and elements of it will work their way into my PhD work someday. I'm a US military officer who has been working on analyzing Nagashino in particular, and Japanese military history in general, for over 8 years. I *BETTER* have a decent grasp of it Laughing Feel free to ask whatever you need, though be warned I'm at the end of my semester here so a bit busy, I can't guarantee long responses right away. Check out the podcasts I mentioned, I (and the other guys) talk at length about the introduction and impact of guns, and also the Nagashino podcasts necessarily touch on the subject as well. I can't give you a copy of my full paper, as I'm getting it ready for publication, but I'd be happy to answer any questions I can.


Quote:
I have in my possession an English translation of Arai Hakuseki's Tokushi Yoron, Lessons From History. Is this a good read?


Perhaps someone else will have a better answer for you on this. Maybe it is, you'll have to look at it. What I've found is that sources like that are less useful when you're looking for facts, and more useful if you're looking for how people of the Edo period PERCEIVED things.
_________________
Bring it on, laddie 'Domer
The Sengoku Field Manual Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wiranobu
Village Councilman
Village Councilman
Member for 1 year



Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 46
Location: Indonesia

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 1:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
I see, so even data can be biased because of the political circumstances in Edo Era. That Tokushi Yoron is in fact written in Edo Jidai (1712) Confused .

And just as you said in your video, it can be exaggerated, such as the number of arquebus ashigaru used by Oda-Tokugawa, some sources it's 3000, some say 1000

The Onin war which was written in Tokushi Yoron p255 is certainly strange, because here it's listed as Hosokawa is in command of over 160.000-odd men and Yamana 116.000 men, however from George Sansom's A History of Japan: 1334-1615 it's Hosokawa 85.000 men and Yamana 80.000 men

I would be happy to acquire more data as I read your references

I will definitely ask more I have more questions in the future if you don't mind
_________________
One man's washing machine is another man's music
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
ltdomer98
Daijo Daijin
Daijo Daijin
Veteran Member



Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 4963
Location: Bayou Country

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
To add another source for you to look at:

Quote:
Birt, Michael P. “The Transformation of the Sixteenth-Century Kanto.” Journal of Japanese Studies, Vol. 11., No. 2 (Summer, 1985). Pp. 369-399


You'll find this article very helpful to you, for this and the other questions you've posted in the other thread.
_________________
Bring it on, laddie 'Domer
The Sengoku Field Manual Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wiranobu
Village Councilman
Village Councilman
Member for 1 year



Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 46
Location: Indonesia

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2012 4:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
ltdomer98 wrote:
To add another source for you to look at:

Quote:
Birt, Michael P. “The Transformation of the Sixteenth-Century Kanto.” Journal of Japanese Studies, Vol. 11., No. 2 (Summer, 1985). Pp. 369-399


You'll find this article very helpful to you, for this and the other questions you've posted in the other thread.


That's a journal right? I found it on JSTOR, but can't download it because my campus is not giving access to download it Crying or Very sad
_________________
One man's washing machine is another man's music
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
ltdomer98
Daijo Daijin
Daijo Daijin
Veteran Member



Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 4963
Location: Bayou Country

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Your school won't give you access? Odd.

Send me a private message with your email address and I'll send it to you. Click the "PM" icon at the bottom of my message.
_________________
Bring it on, laddie 'Domer
The Sengoku Field Manual Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Sakura
Peasant
Peasant
Member for 1 year



Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2012 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
ltdomer98 wrote:
Your school won't give you access? Odd.


Not all JSTOR subscriptions have access to all journals. I've come up against the error a couple times.

Never had it happen with the Journal of Japanese Studies, though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ltdomer98
Daijo Daijin
Daijo Daijin
Veteran Member



Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 4963
Location: Bayou Country

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2012 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Sakura wrote:
ltdomer98 wrote:
Your school won't give you access? Odd.


Not all JSTOR subscriptions have access to all journals. I've come up against the error a couple times.

Never had it happen with the Journal of Japanese Studies, though.


yes, but I'd assume a school account would have maximum access. I suppose it depends on what level of licensing the school is willing to pay for.
_________________
Bring it on, laddie 'Domer
The Sengoku Field Manual Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Samurai Archives Citadel Forum Index // Samurai History - Kamakura to Sengoku All times are GMT - 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Help the Samurai Archives




alexisRed v1.2 // Theme Created By: Andrew Charron // Samuraized By: Aaron Rister

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group