Register :: Log in :: Profile   


Review: Daily Life and Demographics in Ancient Japan

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Samurai Archives Citadel Forum Index // Ancient Japan to Heian
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JLBadgley
Iki no Kami
Iki no Kami
Forum Kanrei
Forum Kanrei



Joined: 09 Apr 2007
Posts: 1569
Location: Washington, DC, USA

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:21 am    Post subject: Review: Daily Life and Demographics in Ancient Japan Reply with quote
Review: William Wayne Farris's Daily Life and Demographics in Ancient Japan

Interested in the population trends of the Nara through Heian periods? Than this small monograph is for you. Of course, if a long discussion about the vagaries of historical documents and the historiography thereof isn't your cup of tea, I hate to say that this particular pamphelet may not be up your alley.

That isn't to say it is a poor buy. For serious students interested in the discussion of population trends and what it means about the life of the Japanese people, this is a great resource. Farris not only condences the most recent scholarship on the issue, but also explores the history of the discussion, starting with the pre-war authors.

This small work, which builds on Farris's previous books on population, famine, and pestilence in early Japan, starts specifically with population estimates from 700-1150. It continues with the variables that contributed to mortality during that period as well as various background factors.

I don't see any great new groundbreaking concepts, but the consolidation of the information will be of assistance to those interested in the study of this early period. There are plenty of tables, and some appendices of possible interest. Farris includes a discussion of the Wamyo sho and the Shugai sho, two of the primary sources, including a chart of the totals of arable land provided in each.

This isn't a large work--only a little more than 100 pages, so it is a quick read for anyone interested in the topic. It is also #63 of the Michigan Monograph Series in Japanese Studies, a good line to check out in general.

For interesting books and titles, remember to check out the S-A Bookstore, where proceeds from the sale of books will go to help keep the lights on here at the Samurai Archives Japanese History Page and Forums!

-Josh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
leakbrewergator
Ronin
Ronin
Member for 4 years



Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 236
Location: Tampa

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Sounds like a great "prequel" to Japan's Medieval Population, which is one of my favorites. Farris makes the study of demographics, which usually puts me to sleep, very interesting. I'll have to check this out.
_________________
A person who knows but a little will put on an air of knowledge. This is a matter of inexperience. When someone knows something well, it will not be seen in his manner. This person is genteel.
- Yamamoto Tsunetomo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tatsunoshi
Miko no Kami
Miko no Kami
Forum Kanrei
Forum Kanrei
Multi-Year Benefactor
Multi-Year Benefactor



Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 4615
Location: 京都日本 Cincinnati, OH

PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Farris also has a long essay in the new "Heian Japan: Centers & Peripheries" (a great book with essays by many of the leading names in pre-modern Japanese history) that covers much the same ground. In fact, the medieval population book, the book being reviewed here, the essay, and his newest book, "Japan to 1600: A Social and Economic History" all borrow extensively from each other-so much so that it's almost Turnbullian. The newest book (Japan To 1600) is supposed to be a general survey of Japanese history, but doesn't really deliver the goods on that front (although it does a good job of continuing his work in the demographics field). In addition, it has some really glaring errors I'm surprised that such a well respected scholar would make-such as stating Hideyoshi took a Chinese Princess as his consort during the Bunroku No Eki, declared himself winner of the conflict, and withdrew all his troops (and then tried again in 1597).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
leakbrewergator
Ronin
Ronin
Member for 4 years



Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 236
Location: Tampa

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
I really like Farris' work, but I do agree that he sometimes makes statements that make you scratch your head. Remember the whole Fukuro Mochi discussion? I do like the way he presents his research, though.
_________________
A person who knows but a little will put on an air of knowledge. This is a matter of inexperience. When someone knows something well, it will not be seen in his manner. This person is genteel.
- Yamamoto Tsunetomo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mr No-Dachi
Rice Farmer
Rice Farmer
Member for 3 years



Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Posts: 43

PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Well this thread seems as good as any to ask about Farris' Heavenly Warriors book about the evolution of japanese armeis 500-1300. Is it a good/accurate read? Especially when compared to Karl F Fridays' works on similar subject matter (I ask because with Farris I can buy one big book instead several smaller Friday ones)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
leakbrewergator
Ronin
Ronin
Member for 4 years



Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 236
Location: Tampa

PostPosted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Mr No-Dachi wrote:
Well this thread seems as good as any to ask about Farris' Heavenly Warriors book about the evolution of japanese armeis 500-1300. Is it a good/accurate read? Especially when compared to Karl F Fridays' works on similar subject matter (I ask because with Farris I can buy one big book instead several smaller Friday ones)


I'd say go with Friday's books. I don't have Heavenly Warriors so I can'r speak on it directly, but I do prefer Friday over Farris. Plus, Farris' works usually produce some questions that go unanswered while Friday seems to cover everything quite well, especially for a smaller work.
_________________
A person who knows but a little will put on an air of knowledge. This is a matter of inexperience. When someone knows something well, it will not be seen in his manner. This person is genteel.
- Yamamoto Tsunetomo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tsubame1
Hida no Kami
Hida no Kami
Veteran Member



Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 1370
Location: Magenta, Northern Italy

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Mr No-Dachi wrote:
Well this thread seems as good as any to ask about Farris' Heavenly Warriors book about the evolution of japanese armeis 500-1300. Is it a good/accurate read?


Can't speak as a solid knowledge reader about al the matters described, but it was of great help to me in the study of the developement of japanese swrod, but it has a few major errors about the matter, a couple quiet ridicolous. But again it has given me the ideas and bibliography to address my work.

Worth the reading IMHO.
_________________
.
Carlo

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Mr No-Dachi
Rice Farmer
Rice Farmer
Member for 3 years



Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Posts: 43

PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 3:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
In fact, the medieval population book, the book being reviewed here, the essay, and his newest book, "Japan to 1600: A Social and Economic History" all borrow extensively from each other-so much so that it's almost Turnbullian. The newest book (Japan To 1600) is supposed to be a general survey of Japanese history, but doesn't really deliver the goods on that front (although it does a good job of continuing his work in the demographics field). In addition, it has some really glaring errors I'm surprised that such a well respected scholar would make-such as stating Hideyoshi took a Chinese Princess as his consort during the Bunroku No Eki, declared himself winner of the conflict, and withdrew all his troops (and then tried again in 1597).


He also seems to maintain his belief that Oyumi were handheld crossbows and that individual combat was the rule. Those were pretty much only things I found disagreeable in Heavenly Warriors too. As a basic social and economic history Japan to 1600 has a lot going for it.

Though I was surprised by how much power he says women had in pre-late Heian Japan, I'm so used to thinking about Japan being always patriarchial and chauvanist (in typical Neo-confucian style). Though sometimes I wonder about him using "armour made to accomodate breasts" as evidence for women in combat.

By the way does anyone know how his demographic story of Japan fits into the Japanese language historiography, are they quite mainstream?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Date Onigiri
Peasant
Peasant
Member for 4 years



Joined: 22 Dec 2008
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Farris is a wussy. His scholarship is sliding, he's an arrogant man living in a cracked ivory tower and his ego is bigger than a pile of all the sammyrai history books written by Stephen Turdball.

Enough said.

And yes, the Rice Ball Sammyrai is BAAAACK!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Samurai Archives Citadel Forum Index // Ancient Japan to Heian All times are GMT - 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Help the Samurai Archives




alexisRed v1.2 // Theme Created By: Andrew Charron // Samuraized By: Aaron Rister

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group